Perversion is a phenomenon in itself, or is it? It is in extreme cases synonymous with obscenity or voyeurism, or is it? It is a curve that reverses the direction of something, a kink if you will. Rest I leave to your pervert imagination.
Living in a developing country where resources are limited and recreation of the healthy type meant for only the rich perversion makes up a considerable chunk of our vocabulary, entertainment, folklore and discussion. It is filling up one void in the filthy streets of our country and also adoring the decor in posh houses.
For a doctor like myself who has seen it all and more so read it all the human sexuality holds very different connotations and meanings. Generally speaking I would not hold same ideas about sexuality as the general public would think about it. Here I don't mean to say that everyone out there has nothing else on their mind but to think about this bodily function. But all I see around myself I can very well say with some level of hardcore surety that these thoughts visit the average mind of every youngster in this country more often than they should.
Any perversion has only two possible meanings in my vocabulary. It is either normal or abnormal. It is simple plain categorized into a yes or no spectrum. All the perverse happenings are therefore a mere act of physiology and few bordering into pathology.
It is the filth that our elders choose not to see the young read, write and talk about all day. Perhaps for good reason too. Who would stop you once you get going the roller coaster ride or any other kind of ride. It doesn't mean that as you become old you loose your touch with perversion. People find ways as does water around rocks and obstacles.
Religion once told me that it wouldn't endorse any such behaviors very openly but rather discreetly. If it does so this would mean the whole society going down the drain. Its like electricity line losses. They are bound to occur but efforts are always made to keep them at minimum through active use of wits. This perversion then, is a tax that the society has to pay for all the non perversions that it enjoys.
I didn't believe religion then and I don't believe it now when it is interpreted by narrow minded people and it comes up with the above explanations. I don't have the alternate hypothesis though but this doesn't mean that I have to accept a hypothesis that is known to be flawed.
Living in a developing country where resources are limited and recreation of the healthy type meant for only the rich perversion makes up a considerable chunk of our vocabulary, entertainment, folklore and discussion. It is filling up one void in the filthy streets of our country and also adoring the decor in posh houses.
For a doctor like myself who has seen it all and more so read it all the human sexuality holds very different connotations and meanings. Generally speaking I would not hold same ideas about sexuality as the general public would think about it. Here I don't mean to say that everyone out there has nothing else on their mind but to think about this bodily function. But all I see around myself I can very well say with some level of hardcore surety that these thoughts visit the average mind of every youngster in this country more often than they should.
Any perversion has only two possible meanings in my vocabulary. It is either normal or abnormal. It is simple plain categorized into a yes or no spectrum. All the perverse happenings are therefore a mere act of physiology and few bordering into pathology.
It is the filth that our elders choose not to see the young read, write and talk about all day. Perhaps for good reason too. Who would stop you once you get going the roller coaster ride or any other kind of ride. It doesn't mean that as you become old you loose your touch with perversion. People find ways as does water around rocks and obstacles.
Religion once told me that it wouldn't endorse any such behaviors very openly but rather discreetly. If it does so this would mean the whole society going down the drain. Its like electricity line losses. They are bound to occur but efforts are always made to keep them at minimum through active use of wits. This perversion then, is a tax that the society has to pay for all the non perversions that it enjoys.
I didn't believe religion then and I don't believe it now when it is interpreted by narrow minded people and it comes up with the above explanations. I don't have the alternate hypothesis though but this doesn't mean that I have to accept a hypothesis that is known to be flawed.
Comments